Demon in a Dress?

Introduction The term monster might have its roots in the Latin word monere (to warn), but it has since evolved to various symbolic meanings, from a terrifying mythical creature person of extreme cruelty. No matter flexibility use, is mostly meant be derogatory (Asma). As Gilmore puts it, monsters “embody all that dangerous and horrible human imagination” (1). However, may argued sometimes perform much-needed work defining policing our norms (Mittman Hensel). Since their archetype predisposed transgressing boundaries integrity (Gilmore), they help establish deviation between in-human. Their cognition action are considered ‘other’ (Kearney) means with which people can understand what right wrong, divergent appropriate ways being. need not even refer werewolves, ogres, vampires, zombies like strike fear audiences through ‘immoral, heinous or unjust’ appearance behaviours. Rather, be, been, readily applied as metaphor describe unthinkable, unethical, brutal actions beings (Beville 5). Inadvertently, “through bodies, words, deeds, show us ourselves” Hensel 2), we consider monstrous about ourselves. Therefore, humans acting deviate societal standards viewed monstrous. This evident representations public relations practitioners media offerings. In practice relations, ethical advocated norm, deviating them unprofessional (Fawkes), contend: long suffered negative stereotypical perception being deceptive, roles receiving less screen time than shows films lawyers, accountants, teachers like, these few depictions distort how view occupation (Johnston). Depictions professions (lawyers, cops, journalists, etc.) tend cliché, contention fewer on further limit possibility for diverse depictions. socialising impact influence content consume reflection real world around (Chandler). Television, particular, capacity prompt heuristic processing (Shurm), messages easily decoded by literacies become immersed viewing experiences (Gerbner Gross). These gain potency because, despite set fictional worlds, understood reflective audiences’ Tsetsura, Bentley, Newcomb add popular stories recounted authoritative power offer patterns meaning shape individual perceptions. Admittedly, Stuart Hall suggests, offerings encoded ideologies according dominant elite, necessarily preferred meanings. other those exposed agree such position, oppose this viewpoint, remain neutral, dependent experiences. Without frames reference, could viewers portrayals accept representation inevitably does disservice profession. When field suggest, inaccurately, industry dominated men (Johnston), women shown slick dressers who control care little ethics (Dennison), distortions adversely identities collectively (Tsetsura et al.). Public portrayal distance ideal self continuing stuck dichotomy saints sinners (Fawkes). Our observation television Scandal, Flack, Call My Agent!, Absolutely Fabulous, Sex City, You’re Worst, Emily Paris reveals programmes continue perpetuate stereotypes practice, where anything ethical—therefore characters, well-groomed women, debased, liars cheaters will subvert personal professional gain. Portrayals Relations Practitioners Television Media According Miller, eight archetypical traits identified are: ditzy, obsequious, cynical, manipulative, money-minded, isolated, accomplished, unfulfilled. later research, Yoon Black found tended suggest were heartless, manipulative bullies, while Lambert White contend depiction profession improved more positive, nonetheless continues do presenting female workers, especially, “shallow loveable” (18). We too find portrayed morally ambiguous characters willing break codes conduct suit needs clients. discuss three themes prevalent tropes characterise To Be Not Slick Skilful Liar? Most present skilful liars, authoritative, convinced lying only protect fact, most cases believe also advocate juniors ‘a bit lying’ almost necessary maintain client relationships ensure campaign success. For example, British drama main character Robyn (played Anna Paquin) heard advising her prodigy “just assume everyone”. feature dilemma expectations roles, struggling engage deception part jobs. presented somewhat an ugly duckling modest programme, always rational explicit position power. Lily Collins), working social manager, regularly questions approaches taken firm she works for. Her boss Sylvie Grateux Philippine Leroy-Beaulieu), embodies status quo, constantly disapproving Emily’s lack sophisticated self-presentation, among aspects. episode ‘Faux Amis’, quips “it’s you personally. It’s everything stand enemy luxury because defined sophistication taste, emilyinparis”. Similarly, first Samuel Kerr Alain Rimoux), head film publicity firm, solves conundrum faced his anxious junior Gabriel Grégory Montel) suggesting he lie reason why lost film. modestly dressed someone cares for, Samuel, towering over him impeccable confident demeanour, advises “who said lying? Don’t lie. Simply don’t tell truth”. subtext here unnecessary hurt doing so nurtures relationship. So, lets audience decide morality here. It moral ambiguity Such grey often crafted allow relate themselves encouraging Hawkins refers mental play. Audiences interested black white veer towards Agent! storylines hone bad greater good. ways, still transgress likely effect others utilitarian nature. interesting note physical made play crucial role showcasing prestige senior practitioner. focus attire unfavourable high income earners (Grandien) styled branded apparel lacking substance morals (Fröhlich Peters). Promiscuous Women urge attract lead developing cementing uninhibited live blurred lines professional. inherently bad, instead indulge lives excess. definition monstrous, Arumugam suggests excess insatiable appetites direct monster’s behaviour, Kearney outlines uncontainable signals difference others. identifiable Patsy Stone Joanna Lumley) Fabulous. She alcoholic, uses recreational drugs, highly promiscuous, chain-smokes throughout series. depicted prone deceptively vices. snorting cocaine having sex Those reviewing highlight “its dark, acidic sense humour” (Greene) condemn emphasises “depraved publicist” trope (Knibbs) call “one worst TV ever made” though trying concerns raised MeToo movement respect (McGurk). Female Robyn, willingness question tried sleep her, appear undermine empowerment rather support archetypes abhor. Samantha Jones Kim Cattrell) City sexually liberated, one another describes Samantha’s vagina “the hottest spot town: it’s open”. many sexual behaviour reflects post-feminist narrative empowerment, agency, choice, read product practitioner frequenting parties bars rubs shoulders clients, celebrities, high-profile businesspeople. end, Patsy, Samantha, glamourise paint simply extension liberated promiscuous selves, any expectation professionalism ethic. stark contrast reality, occupy technical see much spent hard yards promotion (Krugler). Making Others Err just themselves, quite adept at making deceitful acts behalf, thus nonchalantly oppressing get way. although lauded elevating African-American woman maintaining misrepresentations race (Lambert), Olivia Pope Kerry Washington) programme Scandal subverts law clients considering herself “good guys” wearing “white hat”. Over course seven seasons, rig elections, plant listening devices political figures’ offices, bribe, threaten, affair President. some cases, calls services colleague Huck literally, figuratively, rid barriers way protecting season one’s Crash Burn asks torture suspect information dead client. request friend colleague, regardless perceived good motivations, reinforces Mittman’s categorisation Here, includes torturing revisiting psychological trauma Huck’s character. struggles overcome past killer spends curb tendencies brought PR Olivia’s requests. Although striving justice, desire results act monstrously, inadvertently contributes racist sexist been associated perceptions Other. Across space, certain ethnic groups, African descent, demonic (Cohen). feminine discarded conform patriarchal order society (Creed). Pope’s practitioners, perpetuates inaccurate American descent. Striving Ethical majority encouraged, expected, guidelines respect, admiration, in-group status. New Zealand, opt members Institute Zealand (PRINZ) required abide association’s code ethics. stipulates bound serve interests ensuring honest, disclose conflict interests, follow law, professionalism, openness privacy maintained, uphold values loyalty, fairness, independence (PRINZ). Global Alliance Communication Management binds together identifies nine guiding principles adhered recognised ethically. include obeying laws, public’s interest, freedom speech assembly, integrity, upholding sensitive matters name few). governing designed field. Of course, trouble claim local global bodies. implies associations PRINZ able enforce across board. alone, consultants had financial reparations defamatory online (Fisher), alleged bribed assault victim prevent giving evidence court case (Hurley). Some academics accused engaged organised (Peacock), common, nor transgressors accepted into bodies afford authenticity legitimacy. conscience organisations (Schauster, Neill, Ferrucci, Tandoc). Furthermore, rated better average adult when came solving dilemmas reasoning (Schuaster Additionally, training guidance mentors continued contribute ratings relations. What findings screens exaggerations practice. Substance, But Necessarily Power Exploring Topic, Cunha, Reigstad, Jele-Sanchez, Moreno subordinated male counterparts inclined two-way communication, balanced perspectives, negotiate, build cooperation. competitiveness, independence, exhibited there men. Fitch argues, culture dominate characteristics end up elements permeate messages, instances fact feminist “loyalty, ethics, morality, [and] fairness” life (Vardeman-Winter Place 333). feminised field, struggle glass ceiling, dominating executive positions out-earning (Pompper). Interestingly, limited due gender area ethnographic study Sissons worked consultancies relatively powerless vis-à-vis asymmetry negatively affected practitioner’s decision-making. immoral, glamourous, programmes, reality mired gendered occupation. Accordingly, seem capture emphasise specialises image management; ideology expected look carry particular ultimately constructing aesthetic diminish women’s self-esteem. Conclusion Miller’s twenty years old, trend cynical remains. shifts loveable, yet shallow, Alexis Rose Schitt’s Creek, appeal Cohen reveal “what member same dictates rejected, authority leaders customs disintegrates subordination hierarchy lost” (68). enjoy watching metaphorical exhibit behaviours repressed beings; depict happens disturbed (Levina Bui). At very least, act, narratives do, cautionary tale think Mittman argue, learn exist within beings. Cohen, teach learn, case, better. insights usually effective invisible (Chorazy Harrington), if unaware practices occupation, reference point limits opportunities critically evaluate representations. certainly harm perpetuating existing charming immoral perhaps identity References Created Jennifer Saunders Dawn French. French Productions, 1992-1996. Arumugam, Indira. “Gods Monsters: Insatiable Appetites, Exceeding Interpretations Surfeit Life.” Monster Anthropology. Eds. Yasmine Musharbash Geir Henning Presterudstuen. Routledge, 2020. 44-58. Asma, Stephen, T. On An Unnatural History Worst Fear. Oxford UP, 2009. Beville, Maria. Unnameable Literature Film. 2013. Fanny Herrero. France Televisions, 2015-2020. Chandler, Daniel. Cultivation Theory. Aberystwyth U, 1995. 5 Aug. 2021 <http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel//Documents/short/cultiv.html>. Chorazy, Ella, Stephen Harrington. “Fluff, Frivolity, Fabulous Jones: Representations Entertainment.” Entertainment Values. Ed. Palgrave, 2017. Jeffrey J. U Minnesota P, 1996. Creed, Barbara. Monstrous-Feminine: Film, Feminism, Psychoanalysis. 1993. Dennison, Mikela. Analysis Discourse Its Popular Culture. Masters Thesis. Auckland: Auckland University Technology, 2012. Paris. Darren Starr. Starr 2020-present. Fawkes, Johanna. “A Jungian Conscience: Self-Awareness Practice.” Review 41.5 (2015): 726-33. Fisher, David. “’Hit’ Jobs Case: Consultant Apologises Promises Cash Settle Defamation Case That Came Dirty Politics”. Herald, 3 Mar. 2021. 7 July <https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/hit-jobs-case-pr-consultant-apologises-and-promises-cash-to-settle-defamation-case-that-came-from-dirty-politics/C4KN5H42UUOCSXD7OFXGZ6YCEA/>. Fiske, John. 2010. Fitch, Kate. “Promoting Vampire Rights Amendment: Relations, Postfeminism True Blood”. 607-14. Flack. Oliver Lansley. Hat Trick 2019-2021. Fröhlich, Romy, Sonja B. Peters. “PR Bunnies Caught Agency Ghetto? Gender Stereotypes, Organizational Factors, Women’s Careers Agencies.” Journal Research 19.3 (2007): 229-54. Gerbner, George, Larry Gross. “Living Television: Violence Profile”. 26.2 (1976): 172-99. Gilmore, David D. Evil Beings, Mythical Beasts, All Manner Imaginary Terrors. Pennsylvania P. Management. Code Ethics. 14 <https://www.globalalliancepr.org/code-of-ethics>. Greene, Steve. “Flack: Amazon Resurfaced Show’s First Season Just Right Time.” IndieWire, 22 Jan. <https://www.indiewire.com/2021/01/flack-review-amazon-prime-video-anna-paquin-1234610509/>. Hall, Stuart. “Encoding/Decoding”. Culture, Media, Language. Doothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, Paul Willis. 1980. 128-138. Hawkins, Gay. “The Ethics Television”. International Cultural Studies 4.4 (2001): 412-26. Hurley, Sam. Firm Hired Do Rich-Lister’s Work”. 30 <https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/inside-story-the-pr-firm-hired-to-do-a-rich-listers-dirty-work-and-make-a-court-case-disappear/7FKKEADHWIBT64POKDH3ADEDE4/>. Johnston, Jane. “Girls Screen: How Film Depict Relations.” PRism 7.4 (2010): 1-16. Kearney, Richard. Strangers, Gods Interpreting Otherness. London: 2003. Knibbs, Brief Pop Publicist.” Ringer 27 Feb. 2019. <https://www.theringer.com/tv/2019/2/27/18241636/flack-publicists-pop-culture>. Krugler, Elizabeth. Relations: Influence Leaders Relations. Iowa State University, Lambert, Cheryl Ann. “Post-Racial Primetime Represents Pope.” 43.4 (2017): 750-54. Ann, Candace White. “Feminization film? Occupational Roles Characters Movies.” 6.4 (2012): 1-24. Levina, Marina, Diem-My Bui. “Introduction”. Culture 21st Century. Marina Levina Bloomsbury, 1-13. McGurk, Drama Flack Might One Shows Ever Made.” GQ Magazine 19 <https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/flack-tv-show-review>. Karen S. “Public Fiction: 1930 1995.” 11.1 (1999): 3-28. Mittman, Asa Simon. “Introduction: Impact Monsters Studies.” Ashgate Companion Monstrous. Simon Peter Dendle. Ashgate, 1-14. Simon, Marcus Hensel. A Marvel Monsters.” Primary Sources Demonstrare Volume Two. Leeds: Arc Humanities 2018. 1-6. Peacock, Colin. “Expert Says Needs Upgrade.” Radio Sep. <https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/mediawatch/audio/2018713710/expert-says-pr-needs-an-ethical-upgrade\ >. Pompper, Donnalyn. “Interrogating Inequalities Perpetuated Feminized Field: Using Critical Race Theory Intersectionality Lens Render Visible Which Should Disaggregated.” Perspectives Voice, Image Identity. Christine Daymon Kristin Demetrious. 67-86. Zealand. March <https://prinz.org.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/PRINZ-Code-of-Ethics-2020.pdf>. Scandal. Shonda Rimes. ABC Studios, 2012-2018 City. HBO Entertainment, 1998-2004. Creek. Eugene Dan Levy. Real Company Schauster, Erin, Marlene Patrick Edson Tandoc. Primed: Update Practitioners’ Moral Reasoning, Development Maintenance.” 35.3 (2019): 164-79. Shrun, L.J. “Processing Strategy Moderates Effect.” Human 27.1 94-120. Sissons, Helen. “Lifting Veil PRP-Client Relationship.” Inquiry 4.3 263-86. Topić, Martina, Maria Joäo Chunha, Amelia Alenka Ángeles Moreno. “Women (1982-2019).” 24.4 (2020): 391-407. Katerina, Joshua Taylor Newcomb. “Idealistic Conflicted: Film.” 41 652-61. Vardeman-Winter, Jennifer, Katie R. Place. “Still Lily-White Field Women: Workforce Diversity Practice Research.” 43.2 326-336. Yoon, Youngmin, Heather Black. “Learning Is Profession Portrayed?” Science 28.2 85-106. Worst. Falk. Hooptie 2014-2019.